who needs srcs testing ? lol

[bmillay]

as some of u know i am an electronics expert and have experience in military electronics and le electronics such as breath analyzers and radar - i am not le - we sold the products b4 anyone goes imagining .......

as luck and nature would have it .....whenever a substance is bombarded with rf waves ....including light ....... it will give off a known and measurable amount of signal or additional signals ..... enter spectronomy ....when we prototyped different breath analyzers we would have a tube that the breath vapor would fill and then on one end we would inject infrared light through a lens ......then at the other end of the tube we would ....with the use of photodetectors tuned for the ir ......measure the attenuation and spectrum of the signal.....then use this to calculate through a microprocessor the breath alcohol content of the vapor in the tube ........with me so far?.......well .... i also know that if you were to bombard a vial of research material in liquad form......you can detect and measure the amount of signal reflected from the target ......now if you had a solid known reference to be begin with .....then you could compare ......using something as simple as an led bargraph ......the calibrated known point to the target under test.......
i have found the following to be even better than what i was going to build .......take a look and give comments on this guys ......what say you
what do you do with it???? thats up to you !!!!!

[upondeez]

That GIZMO is incredible B! I can tell you what you can do with it, pack it up and ship it to me! LOL!

Good stuff B!

[fragboy]

Good stuff. How would you figure out the purity leve?l

[bigriggs00]

That sounds like a nice little setup....Do you still have to send off to test your control group or would you use a human grade vial for a reliable comparison? There is still a little room for deviation but it sounds like you can get it within a decent range. Pretty awesome.

[Strateg0s]

Pretty slick gadget you're talking about. But I would think that since you would be looking at a mix of substances, you would need to have a control sample made with the exact same recipe, and that even differences between the solvents and carriers would show up. But perhaps I am underestimating the capabilities... after all, people using a breathalyzer don't need to have eaten the same meal and have chewed the same gum before getting pulled over.

The other thing is that if you offered this anywhere in the US, you'd likely find yourself in the clink, given how hysterical the issue of steroids is down there these days. If you offered something which was something of an all-purpose purity tester, well, I think you'd probably do pretty well for yourself. Do you need different hardware, e.g. frequency crystals, for different detections?

[Dilaudid]

lol... nope lost me from the get go....

[bmillay]

Originally Posted by fragboy

Good stuff. How would you figure out the purity leve?l

note the spectrum in the laptop screen? this is signal strength (y axis) vs. frequency or wavelength (x axis) - purity would be sensed as lack of harmonics which are additional little spikes on the curve - showing "scattering " of the rf through the substance - lack of little spikes would indicate it is clean - no particles that do not belong - and we are talkin bout things u could not see

[bmillay]

Originally Posted by bigriggs00

That sounds like a nice little setup....Do you still have to send off to test your control group or would you use a human grade vial for a reliable comparison? There is still a little room for deviation but it sounds like you can get it within a decent range. Pretty awesome.

the control group would absolutely be needed in the beginning to get a "reliable " curve for comparison - once this was gotten - it would be saved into the computer forever - yes the control would HAVE TO BE something reliable such as human grade from a top company. then as samples were taken harmonics and additional "spikes" would indicate purity and the peaks (how tall the curve is ) would be indicators of strength (content "300mg for example )

[bmillay]

Originally Posted by Strateg0s

Pretty slick gadget you're talking about. But I would think that since you would be looking at a mix of substances, you would need to have a control sample made with the exact same recipe, and that even differences between the solvents and carriers would show up. But perhaps I am underestimating the capabilities... after all, people using a breathalyzer don't need to have eaten the same meal and have chewed the same gum before getting pulled over.

The other thing is that if you offered this anywhere in the US, you'd likely find yourself in the clink, given how hysterical the issue of steroids is down there these days. If you offered something which was something of an all-purpose purity tester, well, I think you'd probably do pretty well for yourself. Do you need different hardware, e.g. frequency crystals, for different detections?

not offering anything here but an education and helpin my ppl
and yes you would have to have a control for each sample type - like a tren control - a test c control - test e control - etc - but only one initially until it was saved to the hard drive - then not needed ever again - the percentages of ba, etc would alter the frequency and the strength part of the curve but it would still be very close - we could not ever say it is "labeled as this" and tested at this but it would be good enough within +-3%
this is all for education only
there is no way in HELL i would be slick enough to take in samples and do this ........scrs didnt and they are licensed to do so

[ajdos]

Sounds interesting - once the base values are established it sure would be nice to test some of the shit going around these days- god knows I have had shit in the past that my biological meter said was dog piss- like to see it backed up with the tech measurements as well.

[demonsweat]

Wow very interesting, Bmillay. I hope this goes somewhere and becomes useful. Seems promising!

[demonsweat]

I'm bumping this up in hopes of staying updated regarding progress with this gadget.